Freeness of the Quantum Coordinate Algebras

نویسنده

  • ZONGZHU LIN
چکیده

The main purpose of this note is to prove that the quantum coordinate algebra A[U ] is free over the ring A = Z[v, v−1]. In [L1], Lusztig defined the quantum coordinate algebra over Q[v, v−1] and prove that it is free as Q[v, v−1]-module. In [APW], Andersen, Polo, and Wen defined the quantum coordinate algebra over the ring A(p,v−1) and proved that the coordinate algebra is free. The main idea was to specialize v to 1 from A(p,v−1) and then use the result from the representation theory of algebraic groups in characteristics p > 0. The two important consequences of specifying v to 1 from A(p,v−1) are that the set of weights of an integrable U -module is W -invariant and the universal highest weight modules D(λ) are free and finitely generated over A(p,v−1) with characters given by Weyl’s character formula using Kempf’s vanishing theorem in characteristic p. Using the ring A(p,v−1) gives restriction on ` when one wants to consider cases when q is an `th root of 1. In [AW], Andersen and Wen extended the freeness to the ring A1, which is still larger than A, by studying the representations at mixed case. In this paper we will use Lusztig’s canonical basis to replace Kempf’s vanishing theorem (or its analogy at mixed cases as in [AW]). But it is still not clear that whether the set of weights of an integrable U -module will be W -invariant (even in the rank 1 case). In Section 2, we introduce the quantum analogue of Joseph’s induction [Jo]. It is not clear that Joseph’s induction functor can be defined on all integrable U≥0-modules of type 1. In Section 3, the freeness of the universal highest weight module D(λ) defined by the Joseph induction over A is proved using the canonical basis constructed by Lusztig [L2]. We will treat the parabolic cases as well. As a consequence, we prove that integrable modules of type 1 are locally A-finite for the parabolic subalgebras. Then using the freeness of the universal highest weight modules, we follow more or less the argument as in [APW] to prove the freeness of the coordinate algebras of the quantum parabolic algebras over A in Section 4. In Section 5, the exactness of certain induction functors is proved using the exactness of the quantum coordinate algebras over A. As application,

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A ] 2 5 A ug 2 00 3 Hilbert space representations of cross product algebras II

In this paper, we study and classify Hilbert space representations of cross product ∗-algebras of the quantized enveloping algebra Uq(e2) with the coordinate algebras O(Eq(2)) of the quantum motion group and O(Cq) of the complex plane, and of the quantized enveloping algebra Uq(su1,1) with the coordinate algebras O(SUq(1, 1)) of the quantum group SUq(1, 1) and O(Uq) of the quantum disc. Invaria...

متن کامل

Unification of Independence in Quantum Probability

Let (∗l∈IA, ∗l∈I(φl, ψl)), be the conditionally free product of unital free *algebras Al, where φl, ψl are states on Al, l ∈ I. We construct a sequence of noncommutative probability spaces (Ã(m), Φ̃(m)), m ∈ N, where Ã(m) = ⊗ l∈I Ã ⊗m l and Φ̃ (m) = ⊗ l∈I φ̃l ⊗ ψ̃ ⊗(m−1) l , m ∈ N, Ãl = A ∗ C[t], and the states φ̃l, ψ̃l are Boolean extensions of φl, ψl, l ∈ I, respectively. We define unital *-homomor...

متن کامل

Quantum Drinfeld Hecke Algebras

We consider finite groups acting on quantum (or skew) polynomial rings. Deformations of the semidirect product of the quantum polynomial ring with the acting group extend symplectic reflection algebras and graded Hecke algebras to the quantum setting over a field of arbitrary characteristic. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for such algebras to satisfy a Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt proper...

متن کامل

Quiver Varieties and Finite Dimensional Representations of Quantum Affine Algebras

Introduction 145 1. Quantum affine algebra 150 2. Quiver variety 155 3. Stratification of M0 163 4. Fixed point subvariety 167 5. Hecke correspondence and induction of quiver varieties 169 6. Equivariant K-theory 174 7. Freeness 178 8. Convolution 185 9. A homomorphism Uq(Lg)→ KGw×C ∗ (Z(w))⊗Z[q,q−1] Q(q) 192 10. Relations (I) 194 11. Relations (II) 202 12. Integral structure 214 13. Standard m...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005